Hoard et al. (1993)

Source Determination of White River Group Silicates from Two Archaeological Sites in the Great Plains.

R.J. Hoard, J.R. Bozell, S.R. Holen, M.D. Glascock, H. Neff, & J.M. Elam (1993). American Antiquity, 58(4): 698-710.

Also includes data from:

Neutron activation analysis of stone from the Chadron Formation and a Clovis site on the Great Plains.

R.J. Hoard, S.R. Holen, M.D. Glascock, H. Neff, & J.M. Elam (1992). Journal of Archaeological Science, 19(6): 655-665.

Abstract

High-quality cryptocrystalline silicates from the Oligocene-age White River Group of the central Great Plains (referred to here as White River Group Silicates [WRGS]) were widely used prehistorically for chipped-stone tools. There are three known source areas for WRGS: Flattop Butte in northeastern Colorado, Table Mountain in eastcentral Wyoming, and the White River Badlands of South Dakota. Specimens from these sources are often visually indistinguishable, making it difficult to specify the source of WRGS from nonquarry archaeological sites. Using a quantitative method-neutron-activation analysis-these sources were differentiated. The sources of WRGS in two Central Plains archaeological sites also were determined using this technique. The results show that the technique has important implications for studies of prehistoric mobility and for the refinement of cultural-historical affiliation.

Number of samples in dataset: 154

The database file is in Excel format (37K in .zip file). Please fill in the following information to receive the files for this publication.


Your name

E-mail address

Institutional or corporate affiliation

How are you using this information?

Recent research reported by the Archaeometry Lab at MURR after June 2005 is based on support by the National Science Foundation under our current grant number 0504015.
Earlier research was supported by several NSF grants, including the following numbers: 8801707, 9102016, 9503035, 9802366, 9977237, 0102325, and 0405042.  Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Last Updated June 2, 2008
© 1996–2007 University of Missouri–Columbia