Molyneaux (2002)

Geochemical Evidence for Long-Distance Exchange

Edited by M. D. Glascock (2002). Bergin and Garvey, Westport, CN.

Exploring the Landscapes of Long-Distance Exchange: Evidence from Obsidian Cliffs and Devil's Tower, Wyoming

B. L. Molyneaux

Abstract

Source analysis of obsidian samples contributes here to research into the environmental knowledge of prehistoric hunter-gatherers. In this particular study, the goal was to identify visually salient landforms - landmarks - that prehistoric groups used as strategic navigational nodes. The approach involved a comparative analysis of lithic raw material diversity. Lithic diversity is commonly associated with the mobility of the tool-makers and the range of their natural resource exploitation. If a landmark inventory has a wider variety of raw materials than nearby sites lacking these salient features, one may hypothesize that groups from a greater diversity of environments, with access to different procurement areas, stopped there. This information may then contribute to a better understanding of how prehistoric peoples perceived, moved through, and used their regional environment. The artifact inventory at Devils Tower National Monument, Wyoming, included 33 obsidian specimens. They derived from several sources:

This range of sources proved to be greater than the range at other sites of comparable size in the region.

Number of samples in dataset:33

The database file is in Excel format (7K in .zip file). Please fill in the following information to receive the files for this publication.


Your name

E-mail address

Institutional or corporate affiliation

How are you using this information?

Recent research reported by the Archaeometry Lab at MURR after June 2005 is based on support by the National Science Foundation under our current grant number 0504015.
Earlier research was supported by several NSF grants, including the following numbers: 8801707, 9102016, 9503035, 9802366, 9977237, 0102325, and 0405042.  Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Last Updated June 2, 2008
© 1996–2007 University of Missouri–Columbia