Sinopoli et al. (2006)

Characterizing the Stoneware “Dragon Jars” in the Guthe Collection Chemical, Decorative and Formal Patterning

C. M. Sinopoli, S. Dueppen, R. Brubaker, C. H. Descantes, M. D. Glascock, W. Griffin, H. Neff, R. Shoocongdej,and R. J. Speakman. (2006) Asian Perspectives 45(2): 240–282.

Abstract

This paper presents a multifaceted study of a collection of stoneware ceramic vessels in the Guthe Collection of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. These vessels, recovered in the Philippines but manufactured in multiple production sites across East and Southeast Asia, provide insights into premodern economic interactions and maritime trade. Our study of this collection drew on multiple approaches to identify coherent groupings of vessels associated with locations and traditions of production. These include instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) of pastes; laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) of glazes; stylistic analysis of decorative motifs and their execution; and study of morphological attributes. Results of our analyses point to at least four production areas for these ubiquitous trade wares and lay the groundwork for future research on Southeast Asian maritime trade from the twelfth through nineteenth centuries A.D.

Number of samples in dataset: 50

The database file is in Excel format (20K in .zip file). Please fill in the following information to receive the files for this publication.


Your name

E-mail address

Institutional or corporate affiliation

How are you using this information?

Recent research reported by the Archaeometry Lab at MURR after June 2005 is based on support by the National Science Foundation under our current grant number 0504015.
Earlier research was supported by several NSF grants, including the following numbers: 8801707, 9102016, 9503035, 9802366, 9977237, 0102325, and 0405042.  Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Last Updated June 2, 2008
© 1996–2007 University of Missouri–Columbia